Skip to content
Subscribe free — The Brief lands every morning New original stories published daily Just in: Apple Boosts iPhone Pro Duo Orders by 44% as Demand Surges Follow our RSS feed for instant updates Search 500+ original tech stories
A historic courtroom with wooden benches, desks with lamps, and marble busts
Apple News

Australian Court Orders Apple to Open iOS to Rival App Stores

Oct 22, 2026, 5:33 AM UTC

Home  /  Apple

Photo by Simon Ray on Unsplash

TL;DR Australia’s Federal Court has ruled that Apple violated national competition laws, ordering the company to permit alternative app stores and outside payment engines on iPhones across the country.

SYDNEY — Apple’s fortress around the iPhone has suffered another major breach. In a decision handed down this morning, the Federal Court of Australia ruled that Apple breached section 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 by leveraging its operating system exclusivity to stifle distribution and payments competition.

The ruling marks the conclusion of a legal offensive launched by Epic Games in late 2020. Justice Jonathan Beach rejected Apple’s long-standing defense that the App Store constitutes a single, indivisible product with iOS security, finding instead that Cupertino effectively runs an independent software distribution market where it engaged in anti-competitive conduct.

Under the terms of the pending injunction, Apple has four months to give Australian users access to third-party marketplaces and allow developers to steer customers toward external web payments without punitive platform surcharges.

Apple iPhone showing app store icon on desk Apple iPhone showing app store icon on desk — Photo by Image Hunter on Pexels

How the Global Mandates Compare

Australia’s verdict mirrors actions taken by the European Commission under the Digital Markets Act, but goes further by explicitly restricting Apple from levying compensatory runtime fees on alternative marketplaces.

MarketLegal BasisThird-Party Stores Permitted?Core Technology Fee / SurchargeDirect Sideloading (Web)?
European UnionDigital Markets Act (2024)YesYes (€0.50 per install over 1M)Yes (authorized notarization)
United StatesEpic v. Apple Rule 65 InjunctionNoYes (up to 27% outside link fee)No
AustraliaCompetition & Consumer Act (2026)YesProhibited pending reviewPending technical remedy

The judgment is an outright validation of the regulatory posture long maintained by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, which intervened during early hearings to argue that closed mobile ecosystems artificially inflate consumer software prices.

A Stricter Constraint on Cupertino’s Re-Monetization Playbook

When Apple adapted to European regulations two years ago, it introduced a 50-cent Core Technology Fee (CTF) for installs beyond one million downloads. That tactic drew fierce blowback from developers who claimed the levy wiped out margins for freemium utilities and indie games.

Justice Beach’s findings preemptively blunt that maneuver. The judgment notes that replacement fee structures designed primarily to offset the elimination of the 30 percent App Store commission violate the spirit of the court’s order. While Apple retains the authority to implement reasonable notarization checks to guard against malicious software, it cannot tie those security checks to proprietary billing collection.

For developers in the gaming sector, the outcome provides immediate strategic relief. Epic confirmed it will bring its Epic Games Store and Fortnite natively to Australian iOS devices as soon as the compliance window opens.

Tim Sweeney speaking on stage at technology conference Tim Sweeney speaking on stage at technology conference — Photo by Cosmin Serban on Unsplash

Apple Prepares Appeal as Global Pressure Mounts

Apple signaled it will immediately seek a stay and petition the Full Court of the Federal Court.

“Today’s decision disregards the rigorous protections we have built into iOS to keep Australian consumers safe from malware, fraud, and invasive tracking,” an Apple spokesperson said in an emailed statement. “We intend to challenge this ruling to protect our users’ privacy and the intellectual property rights that allow our ecosystem to thrive.”

The legal mechanics now shift toward technical remedies. Similar to previous disputes cataloged on Wikipedia’s Epic Games v. Apple timeline, the devil will remain in the implementation. If the court rejects Apple’s request for a stay during the appellate process, Australian engineers will see foreign marketplaces arrive on domestic iPhones before the end of the fiscal year.

Enterprise software vendors and mobile studios operating across biz it channels are already auditing their checkout architectures. After years of watching fragmented court battles in San Jose, Brussels, and Tokyo, Australian developers finally have a court ruling mandating real distribution choices on local hardware.

Sources

Last updated Oct 22, 2026

InnotechInsider Staff

Newsroom

Reporting and analysis from the InnotechInsider editorial team, covering the technology shaping tomorrow.

Related stories